Showing posts with label war. Show all posts
Showing posts with label war. Show all posts

Friday, 26 January 2007

Stop the U.S.A bullying

Looks like the dollar is on its way to collapse with countries like Kuwait abandoning the dinar's peg against the dollar in favor of a basket of currencies to help minimize economic harm after the dollar declined. Last year the dollar fell against the Euro in fact it fell against most currencies.
The U.S. has promised to spend another 10.6 billion on top of the 14.6 it has already "given" in "aid" not including cost of the war this does not include 360 billion on the Iraq war. Check out the link http://nationalpriorities.org/index.php?option=com_wrapper&Itemid=182

The U.S. needs to attract about $2.5 billion a day from foreign investors to keep the dollar steady and fund a current- account deficit that widened to a record $225.6 billion in the third quarter of last year.

So If the world stops investing in the United States, stops trading in the dollar and stops buying American products then The U.S.A would not have the money to be so aggressive to other countries that don't do as they say.

So do yourselves a favour stop using Microsoft windows ( which intelligence agencies can Hack at the drop of a hat and switch to Linux!

Thursday, 25 January 2007

How to cut U.S.A fuel consumption

George Bush in his speech to the union said he wanted to cut petrol consumption by 20%. There is an easy 3 point plan which will reduce consumption by 30%

1. Stop your spoilt ugly twin daughters going off to Argentina to party every 5 minutes. There's 10%

2. Stop secret agents making wasted journeys to harass people for not doing what you want and travelling abroad to make up stories about weapons of mass destruction. There's another 10%

http://willdo.philadelphiaweekly.com/archives/2007/01/81yearold_liber.html great story and a warning for anyone who thinks Bush should be hanged LOL

3. Stop sending the fleet to threaten Iran because they don't agree with you. there's another 10%

See how easy it is for anyone with more than 5 brain cells.

Saturday, 20 January 2007

The death squad manual

Military Commissions Manual

The American defence department sent to its Military Commissions Manual to the congress it makes interesting reading (238 pages). It has a 7 pages of definitions so George can read it and understand words like Shall, pay, supplies and vehicle to name but a few. What strikes me as weird is how comes America can be the accuser and the judge and try the accused (probably some Iraqi defending his country form invasion), shouldn't they be tried through the U.N .
The manual is absolutely biased as you can see from the excerpt from page 35.


(d) When charges may be referred. If the convening authority finds, or is advised by a legal
advisor that there are reasonable grounds to believe that an offense triable by a military
commission has been committed and that the accused committed it, and that the specification alleges
an offense, the convening authority may refer it. The finding may be based on hearsay in
whole or in part. The convening authority or legal advisor may consider information from any
source and shall not be limited to the information reviewed by any previous authority, but a case
may not be referred to a military commission except in compliance with R.M.C. 406. The
convening authority or legal advisor shall not be required before charges are referred to resolve
legal issues, including objections to evidence, which may arise at trial.


This means you can be tried on hearsay.....CRAZY I heard George bush ordered the deaths of 10,000's of Iraqi's will he be tried ...No
This next extract from page 219 should cover American defence department officials as well

(1) MURDER OF PROTECTED PERSONS.
a. Text. “Any person subject to this chapter who intentionally kills one or more protected
persons shall be punished by death or such other punishment as a military commission under this
chapter may direct.”
b. Elements.
(1) The accused without justification or excuse, intentionally and unlawfully kills a
protected person;
(2) The accused knew or should have known of the factual circumstances that
established that person’s protected status; and
(3) The killing took place in the context of and was associated with armed conflict.
c. Comment. The intent required for this offense precludes its applicability with regard to
collateral damage or death, damage, or injury incident to a lawful attack.
d. Maximum punishment. Death.

If a document is fair it should balance out on the scales, but unfortunately it does not its like having a Sherman tank on one side of the scales and a revolver on the other.

Thursday, 18 January 2007

Bush declared mad

Bush's detachment form the real world was confirmed when he announced 4,000 troops will be sent to the Anbar province. What was once one of the most prosperous provinces It is now the most violent region in Iraq. Covering an area of 140,000 square kilometres and a population of of 1.2 million. America has left it with no infrastructure and displaced and killed 10,000's of civilians. It has blown up shops and nearly 40% of schools are "out of order" so exactly what are 4,00 troops going to do?